audix i5 vs sm57 guitar

Required fields are marked *, “As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.”, “Stu is determined to help you make sound decisions, and strives to deliver the best and most in depth content on the internet! If so, we hope you will register now and join our community! Can handle high SPL (sound pressure level). Mic shootout: Audix i5 vs. Shure SM57; Are you a heavy metal guitar player, collector or enthusiast? Despite the cheap price of the mic, the Audix i5 is known to pack quite a number of features that easily make it stand out. Picks up all the subtle details. The typical price you'll find the i5 sold for is not dissimilar to that of Shure's SM57, which has been something of an industry standard in this area for longer than most of us care to remember. SEE THE AUDIX i5 FOR YOURSELF ON AMAZON!! Home Studio Guide – Part I (Introduction), The Best Audiophile Headphones [Complete Buyer’s Guide], The Best Audiophile Headphones (Part II) [Complete Buyer’s Guide], The Best Audiophile Headphones (Part III) [Complete Buyer’s Guide], The Best Audiophile Headphones (Part IV) [Complete Buyer’s Guide], The 5 Best Audiophile Headphones For Under $500, The Best Headphones for Gaming [In Depth Guide]. SM57 vs Audix I5 into Sapphire Pro 40 / FLAC / Acoustic Guitar. The mic must be directly in front of your mouth for best sound. Should make it fairly easy for people to decide if they are on the fence. I did find the i5 more open, airy and richer in sound. However, I bought an Audix i5 to eventually test on snare, but gave it a spin on my amp. And I've only used the I5 a few times just to get a feel for it. The 57 is still a great mic no doubt, but the i5 outshines it just a bit. Both are dynamic microphones that excel in many of the same situations – especially for guitar cabinets and snare drums. At it’s best with snares and guitar cabinets. Comments? iFi Aurora Review – Love At First Sight?! Now without further ado, let’s get rolling!! The mic for guitar amps and snare drums. My choice was to buy both. If I had to choose between the two, I would go with the SM57 because I think it sounds better on guitar amps and vocals, so it’s more versatile for recording on a tighter budget. I play in a couple diferent bands and try to record practice sessions when I can and both my drummers prefer the i5's on their drums over the 57's. Does this all without sounding harsh or boomy. One of the complaints with the 57 is of mic placement; it has to be near perfect, with a lot of experimentation. Blue Yeti vs. AT2020 vs. Samson C01 [Definitive Guide], Philips SHP9500 vs. AKG K702 vs. HIFIMAN DEVA. I like both for different reasons and on different drums. The low end of the i5 is punchier than the 57. I lean toward the i5's, they just sound better on a recording to me (JMHO). Physically the i5 doesn’t fail but is design is pretty basic. Amazing on snares and guitar cabinets. To put it bluntly, nearly everything I’ve read says go for the i5 over the 57. The low end of the i5 is punchier than the 57. An extremely versatile mic with a phenomenal crispness and clarity. I eventually read about a guy who went into Guitar Center to pick up an SM57. The treble is also said to be crispier and smoother, while the SM57’s treble may be too much as far as sibilance. Questions? Nice man! Used that ever since my A/B home test. I have several i5's and a couple of SM57's. Final Word. The Audix i5 is a microphone that is becoming more and more popular among the internet's audio gear forum lurkers. Subscribe here for more awesome demos: Comparison between these two dynamic microphones. Yeah I would go with the Audix i5. Live vocals (wouldn’t really recommend it for studio vocal takes). His sense of humour, coupled with a knack for excellence and strict attention to detail are what allow him to stand out in an crowded industry. Overall people are saying it does perform better for snares as well as guitar amps and cabinets. It’s not as likely to crack with the hit of an accidental flailing drumstick (not the chicken kind). The I5 is the second one in the example. Your email address will not be published. Hi Stu, I’ve had both SM57 and i5 Mics. TJ. In theory the I5 is better, but I've never used an SM57 to make that comparison myself. That being the case, Audix's expectations of this mic must be high, as you can only sell against such a successful brand by being cheaper, better or different in a way that is useful. It may pick up more overtones and need more compression. Or if you need to resale it, turnaround time would likely be quicker. Yeah I would go with the Audix i5. Mogami cables are recommended with the i5. Of course there were a few people who stuck by the 57 (It is still a great mic), but I was a bit skeptical myself. Thanks for stopping by! The i5 has a more forgiving proximity effect than the SM57. Don’t put the mic too close to your amp, or you won’t get the right sound and it will become too punchy. window.dojoRequire(["mojo/signup-forms/Loader"], function(L) { L.start({"baseUrl":"","uuid":"0573ad2c5093a15ee16bc49c5","lid":"f49b0eb597","uniqueMethods":true}) }). The i5 has a higher dB output with a slight boost at 150Hz. This baby needs a good preamp and interface or mixer. SM57 is more common, so should yours break, you're more likely to get a quick replacement on shorter notice. It’s a good compliment to the SM57 when miking an amp especially. When I got the Audix i5, I had to try it out against the SM57. The i5 is said to be richer and fuller in the mid-range than the SM57. Both of these mics are slightly different. Size & Shape. The i5 was picked as one of the "Five Great Mics Under $200"in About.Com Home Recording (Part of the New York Times Company) He states: "If you've got right around $100 to purchase one mic for your studio, the Audix i5 should be it. Stu is determined to help you make sound decisions, and strives to deliver the best and most in depth content on the internet! Used for micing guitar amps and acoustic bluegrass mandolin. The video really sold me and exposed the SM57 a little bit, especially that whole boxiness factor which you can really get a sense of. So yeah it’s said to be even more durable than the SM57. Because the i5 is smaller, it’s easier to fit into tight spaces that may be otherwise cumbersome for the SM57. Could be better than the SM57 on guitar cabinets and bass. The SM57 may be better for clean and sparkly Fender sounds, while the i5 excels in Marshall style distorted sounds. Audix i5. Captures the Marshall DSL40C amp with ease, and especially good with the low mids and detailed highs. Preamp vs. Interface. Did I miss the mark on something? One said it was actually not as good as an Sm57 for recording guitar cabinets. Another endorsement for the i5. Crispness and clarity. In his spare time, he likes to fish, paint, play guitar, pray, rap, make beats, take photos, record videos, graphic design, and more. Your email address will not be published. It’s got more presence, better clarity, a better low end, and just an all around sizzle that’s hard to beat. For a long time I mic'ed amps with the SM57 as per the usual. The salesman ended up telling him to go with the i5, going as far as to actually buy it back from the guy if he didn’t like it better than the Sm57.

Nabisco Famous Chocolate Wafers Substitute, Trader Joe's Cilantro Jalapeno Hummus Nutrition, He Was Despised Handel Analysis, Eclipse In Latin, Ecco Mens Sandals Sale Uk, Spicy Hummus Recipe Jalapeño, Antohi Romanian Pepper Plant,

Comments are closed.